| Pages: [1] |
1. It really hurts me to say this... - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Yes. What Eve needs is a Blockade runner that can't run blockades!
- by Rufis Dangerfield - at 2009.04.19 04:34:00
|
2. 2 Stealth Bomber variants-Cruise/Torp - wouldn't it be better? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Irida Mershkov One of the devs posted that they preferred a single torp bomber with an intended role, rather than have an additional one gimped without a role. If they actually played the game and/or understood that the...
- by Rufis Dangerfield - at 2009.04.18 11:46:00
|
3. Arazu + Pilgrim duo, fitting question - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Tzar'rim It's not the best of combos tbh, An arazu rangedamps while the pilgrim has to get in close to work. They don't really complement eachother. If you DO want to use that combo you'll want to keep the Pilgrim out of lo...
- by Rufis Dangerfield - at 2009.04.09 11:43:00
|
4. CCP: While you're in an ECM nerfing mood... - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Endless Subversion Stop flaming Merin about this. ECM drones are terribly overpowered, esepcially vs smaller ships. I get gayed by them all the time. A single light ECM drone jammed my ECCM'd abaddon yesterday (I have the f...
- by Rufis Dangerfield - at 2009.04.06 14:00:00
|
5. Suggestions to reduce time needed for pvp probing - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I didn't bother reading the OP or thread (sorry) but I do find it a little odd that it's not getting much attention. Just about every post I've seen on the new scanning system has been about how wonderful it is for finding cosmic blah blah- even t...
- by Rufis Dangerfield - at 2009.04.06 11:50:00
|
6. Nerf Remote Reppers - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Aren't remote reppers getting a buff soon?
- by Rufis Dangerfield - at 2009.04.06 02:28:00
|
7. OMG... are you kidding me??? Do you know what they did to the falcon? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Rufis Dangerfield on 04/04/2009 05:03:31 Originally by: Kulmid Prevent is hardly the word that should be used in this sentence. It hardly resists ECM. I've had my anti-falcon alt (read: 4x Caldari Jammer, 2x ECCM and 1 sen...
- by Rufis Dangerfield - at 2009.04.04 04:59:00
|
8. OMG... are you kidding me??? Do you know what they did to the falcon? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Groknor Jesus Christ will all the ****ing whiners shut the **** up?! Falcon was overpowered, any ship that can sit hundreds of km away from a fight and STILL make such a huge difference on the field with minimal danger needs...
- by Rufis Dangerfield - at 2009.04.04 04:52:00
|
9. Pilgrim - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
The pilgrim is an overly specialized ship. It's very effective in a very limited number of circumstances i.e. solo or small gangs, against large, turret using targets, which use a lot of cap. In large gangs, and/or against passive or buffer tank...
- by Rufis Dangerfield - at 2009.04.04 04:33:00
|
10. OMG... are you kidding me??? Do you know what they did to the falcon? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Crackzilla Its not practical to fully test ships as a developer. Players find ways to use ships that developers never thought of. Players will take things to extreme and will capitalize on a 10% difference of ships. Ok...
- by Rufis Dangerfield - at 2009.04.04 03:49:00
|
11. Solo Falcon - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Hagi Yakumota Those of you that are for nerfing ECM into the ground without giving the Rook & Falcon some way of being viable have no since of game balance. It's more a matter of not being interested in game balance, I ...
- by Rufis Dangerfield - at 2009.04.04 03:19:00
|
12. OMG... are you kidding me??? Do you know what they did to the falcon? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Countessa Alba ...now the game has evolved... More to the point, the game has 'devolved'. CCP continues to use the sledgehammer approach to everything, and what's more, often uses it in a way that defies any kind of ex...
- by Rufis Dangerfield - at 2009.04.04 03:06:00
|
13. Some reasons EVE sucks *almost* as much as all other MMOs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Given the apparent importance of storylines when it suits CCP, and the longevity of the game, a general policy of 'nerfing by evolution of technology' rather than 'by nerf bat de-evolution to specific ships/modules while you're sleeping' would be ...
- by Rufis Dangerfield - at 2009.04.04 00:27:00
|
14. Some reasons EVE sucks *almost* as much as all other MMOs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Dracoknight A simple answer with only two words is enough to make the whole thread of whine uselss and make you look stupid: the two words are "Quit EVE" Like it or not... quit complaining... theres others trying to play h...
- by Rufis Dangerfield - at 2009.04.03 12:37:00
|
15. Could we have popular stuff next patch? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Malcanis Stealthbombers and black ops (to name but two...) are getting a massive nerf c/d? People take any buffs they get for granted within a week of receiving them, but they remember the nerfs for ever. One of the b...
- by Rufis Dangerfield - at 2009.04.03 08:36:00
|
16. Stealth Bomber Changes: Unnecessary and Unwanted - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
On the bright side, the new suicide bomber class will die in thousands
- by Rufis Dangerfield - at 2009.04.03 07:15:00
|
17. Could we have popular stuff next patch? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I fully support CCP's ongoing efforts to bring new customers to the game at the expense of gameplay; the introduction of new shiny stuff at the expense of fixing broken stuff; the sledgehammer de-evolution of everything (read: nerfs) and subsequen...
- by Rufis Dangerfield - at 2009.04.03 07:09:00
|
18. Some reasons EVE sucks *almost* as much as all other MMOs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Good OP Akita. Agree with everything you wrote. Too bad it will likely be ignored.
- by Rufis Dangerfield - at 2009.04.03 06:55:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |